For years, fintech companies believed a compelling idea: choose one financial data provider, integrate once, and you're done. One API. One contract. One relationship to manage. It made the tech setup easier, reduced vendor back-and-forth, and gave product teams confidence that the data piece was handled.

In open banking's early days, that belief genuinely moved the industry forward. First-generation aggregators took on the tedious work of connecting to thousands of banks in order to hand companies a clean API to build on. But markets evolve — and what works at launch often breaks down as companies mature.

The Hidden Risks of One Provider

The limitations don't appear overnight. They emerge gradually through deeper integrations and expanding use cases that make switching providers both technically and operationally expensive. By then, you're locked into a single data pipe that controls not just access, but your cost structure, performance benchmarks, and ultimately your customer experience.

The risk compounds quietly. No legacy data provider has perfect coverage across every institution. No single provider delivers consistent enrichment quality across every use case. Consequently, your product immediately feels every outage, renegotiated bank agreement, and pricing increase your provider experiences.

Meanwhile, market consolidation has made this worse. Having fewer dominant players in the field creates the perception of stability, but in reality it actually concentrates risk and reduces your leverage.

Enter the Super Aggregator

A super aggregator doesn't replace legacy data providers; it sits above them. Think of it as the Kayak of financial data: you only have to search once to find all the results and narrow it down to the best one. Similarly, a super aggregator is just one API call, but beneath that single interface is a fully diversified, redundant infrastructure that routes each request dynamically according to cost, performance, availability, and data completeness. When one connection fails, traffic reroutes automatically. There’s no downtime in the meantime, no manual retries, or 2am vendor calls.

We're shifting from data access to data optimization. Companies are no longer asking "which aggregator should we choose?" but "how do we make all of them work harder for us?" With a super aggregator you can do just that: automatically adjust routing when one provider performs better with regional banks, optimize cost among providers when pricing changes, and continuously measure enrichment outputs so that underwriting stays precise and decisioning risk is reduced. With a super aggregator, financial data stops being a pipe you depend on and becomes a system you can control.

Why It Matters Now

The regulatory ground is shifting. Ongoing uncertainty around CFPB Section 1033 means banks are increasingly charging for every data call. This reality makes intelligent routing to the cheapest reliable source a direct way to improve your margin. Risk teams and regulators are asking harder questions about single-provider concentration because of the vulnerabilities they create. And in a market where margins are already compressed, even small improvements in connection success rates or data refresh costs make a big difference over time.

The one-stop provider myth persists because it feels clean. But easy isn't resilient — and in financial infrastructure, that’s a big deal. True simplicity is having one intelligent interface that manages complexity on your behalf. That's the super-aggregator reality — and it's the category Pentadata is building.

‍